FROM VIKINGS TO TALIBAN... We should be better at picking our sparring partners!
80A - very - brief history lesson on our disasters, near disasters and heroic failures
Recently - in the last five years or so - I've been drawn to the political shenanigins of pre- and post-Conquest England. In particular I've been following up on the period between the first Danish invasions and the last battle against the Normans, the siege of Ely when Hereward threatened the stability of William's reign. The biggest concentration of books I've bought, though, is about Godwinson Wulfnothson's clan. The family spanned the fifty or so years between the downfall of Aethelred to the killing of Harold on Caldbec Hill above Hastings on the 14th October, 1066 - in particular the year Duke William took the throne. I have read on other periods after the Conquest, for instance the 'Wars of the Roses' (Sir Walter Scott's name for just another bloody English dynastic spat) and of the maligning of Richard III by Shakespeare for the Tudor dynasty (in the same way as he maligned Macbeth's character for the benefit of James I).
The civil wat begun by Charles I's intransigence that led to his execution for treason against his own people (it had been discovered that he had plans for a Spanish-French invasion of England to prop up his ailing kingship. Charles II had the same intentions before he fell off his perch, too, and then we had to get rid of James II. Two dynasties that brought England low, the Tudors and Stuarts! Losing the Amercian colonies was unavoidable, given the next stooges we had for kings. Then we had the Seven Years' War (otherwise known as 'The War of Jenkins' Ear'.
Came the Napoleonic wars, it took some time to rally the troops and stir them to victory after the Duke of York's experiences with some of the crass 'cash for commissions' squad, who bought their younger sons a captaincy in one or other of our fine regiments. The Navy had got over that hurdle years earlier! Trafalgar, The Peninsular War and Waterloo showed we could win, given the right leadership...
Which was lacking for most of the 19th Century! After beating 'Boney' (Napoleon) and sending him to stew on St. Helena, we took on in fairly quick successionL
The Russians in the Crimean War;
The Zulus in the Zulu War (w hat else?);
The Mahdi (- our new Maxim machine guns and Martini-Henry rifles against their spears and arrows, close call that one!);
The Boers in the Boer War (no surprises there, then), twice (that was a bit sharp!);
Mind you, as we're told in the book 1066 AND ALL THAT, these activities were undertaken to amuse Queen Victoria. I think the last one, the second Boer War just about tipped the balance but she had the edge on them and died before she had to admit she was amused.
Only Edward VII had a notion for reviving the monarchy, but he didn't last long. Edward VIII would have signed us away to Hitler, but his younger brother George VI was sitting on the throne by this time. And then wallop! For the second time in less than twenty years we were at war with Germany. They still did better out of losing than we did in being on the winning side! Then the Israelis bombing British troops in Palestine. Roll on the 1950's... Korea, Mau-Mau's in Kenya, Anthony Eden dragging us into Suez along with the French and Israelis, apartheid in South Africa... The 1960's, double devaluation, Aden, a near-war with China and Harold Wilson dodging the issue of sending British troops into Viernam. Maggie announcing to the world that she was disbanding the Royal Marine Corps and then the Argies invading the Flaklands because there was nobody down there with enough ironwork to keep them out. Good job she sent the army/navy/airforce in there or she'd have been out on her ears. Going into Iraq with the Yanks and the Fench might have served a purpose if we'd kicked out Saddam but Bush Snr pulled the plug on it because he'd got the jitters about the Commies going in if Saddam was out. Didn't happen anyway when he did go. And now we've got the Taliban and the Argies rattling their sabres! - more like their SAM's. Who wouldn't prefer the Vikings coming in again?






